B.C.'s 'Carbon Neutral' Controversy

|

  • Send by emailEmail
  • Comments
  • Printer-friendly versionPrint
Scott MacDonald, CEO of Pacific Carbon Trust | BCBusiness
Image by: Nik West
Scott MacDonald, CEO of the Pacific Carbon Trust, has overseen the creation of a market for carbon credits.

The bet was that collecting a carbon tax and investing in offsets would create a whole new “green economy.” Five years into B.C.’s experiment in legislated carbon neutrality, where’s the payback?

Imagine a vast green swath of pristine forest, wetland and lakefront, where the owner gets paid to simply let the trees grow. Like a green ATM, the forest dispenses money. Such a place exists today in B.C., across 55,000 wild hectares in the Kootenays. It’s called Darkwoods, and when the project was announced in June last year it was the largest carbon-offset forestry deal ever forged in North America. The Nature Conservancy of Canada, which had bought the land in advance of the deal, earned over $4 million on the sale of carbon offsets.

From concept to close, the agreement took more than three years to finalize, during which time a small group of highly specialized project developers, verifiers and auditors set to work putting a value on the carbon stored in the Darkwoods forest. The carbon stored in the leaves, wood and roots of the trees was ultimately packaged into financial instruments known as carbon offsets, in effect putting a dollar value on each tonne of carbon stored in the trees.

Darkwoods is one of about 20 carbon-offset projects created in B.C. to date, many of which have been made possible by legislation that required the B.C. public service to be “carbon neutral” by 2010. And while this legislation has lowered emissions and nurtured the growth of a made-in-B.C. industry specializing in creating carbon offsets, it has also stirred up controversy that refuses to go away.

What exactly is a carbon offset? Darkwoods offers an example that sheds some light on this arcane concept. If a polluter releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, it can “offset” those emissions by paying to guarantee that an equal amount of carbon remains stored safely somewhere else, in this case, in Kootenay forests protected for this express purpose. While the polluter may not have actually reduced its own emissions, buying a Darkwoods carbon offset guarantees an equivalent amount of carbon has been stored somewhere else. Offsetting emissions by contributing to Darkwoods lowers B.C.’s total contribution to global climate change, the theory goes, because the geographic location of the emissions saving is irrelevant, as long as the project creates real and permanent reductions in the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions entering the atmosphere.

B.C. is at the forefront of this carbon-offset “industry” – a cluster of emerging expertise required to evaluate, measure, audit and validate carbon offsets – largely because of legislation enacted in 2007 that requires the B.C. public service to reduce its carbon emissions to zero. Getting to zero is largely an accounting exercise, where public bodies like schools and hospitals must first reduce their real emissions from such sources as paper and heating as much as they can, and then pay to offset the rest. And while it is impossible to run a school or hospital without burning fossil fuel, legislated “carbon neutrality” is technically possible if the public sector can counter the emissions it cannot eliminate by buying offsets.

To make these offset purchases possible, the Pacific Carbon Trust, a B.C. Crown corporation, was hastily created in 2008 to find and sell the carbon offsets needed. (The legislation specified that all offsets have to originate in B.C.) The trust would then take the public money spent on offsets and reinvest it outside of government on greenhouse gas reduction projects across B.C. to help meet ambitious Campbell-era legislated emission targets requiring the province to lower its total greenhouse gas emissions by a full third from 2007 levels by 2020. (Carbon-neutral government was intended as one of the ways B.C. hoped to lower its emissions to hit these overall, province-wide emission targets.) In the process, the Pacific Carbon Trust would stimulate the growth of a B.C. private-sector industry, giving the province a head start to becoming a world centre of a new industry.

But four years after the trust was created, public-sector carbon neutrality has ignited a firestorm of criticism fanned by the likes of Independent MLA for Cariboo North and former NDP forestry critic Bob Simpson, who has gone as far as tabling a private member’s bill aimed at repealing mandatory carbon neutrality. “Carbon-neutral government is nonsense,” Simpson told BCBusiness in late February. “They’re forcing public-sector entities with fixed budgets to pay from their operating budgets back to this Pacific Carbon Trust; meanwhile, the government’s new industrial strategy is going to put emissions through the roof.”

This, despite the fact that, on paper at least, the Pacific Carbon Trust has achieved results. In June 2011, B.C. announced it was the first public service in North America to declare carbon neutrality, thanks to the nearly 730,000 tonnes worth of carbon acquired by the trust and then sold in the form of offsets to government for just over $18 million. And true to its founding vision, the Pacific Carbon Trust has nurtured the growth of a sophisticated cluster of private-sector project developers, validators, verifiers and associated expertise. “We started the company with little more than an empty office, no staff, a clear mandate and good support from the government,” says Scott MacDonald, CEO of the Pacific Carbon Trust. “Over the last three years we’ve been quite successful in achieving our mandate.”

But these successes have not stopped Premier Christy Clark from imposing a review of most of Gordon Campbell’s North America-leading climate policies, including the trust and the mandated carbon-neutral government. And while Clark insists she is taking the climate-action file of her predecessor seriously, she has simultaneously launched a new “B.C. Jobs Plan” economic agenda anchored by mine expansion, carbon-intensive natural gas and liquefied natural gas development, which threatens to jeopardize B.C.’s legislated goal of reducing its emissions – the very targets carbon-neutral government and the trust, among other measures, were created to achieve.

The Pacific Carbon Trust’s origins can be traced back to Gordon Campbell’s unlikely climate conversion in 2006. Convinced that B.C. and North America would take a massive GDP hit if it did not act quickly against human-caused climate change, Campbell whipped his government into action. In the space of about a year, a flurry of legislation was passed – around 10 pieces in all – transforming B.C. from a climate-action laggard to a North American leader. At the heart of the plan were legally binding targets requiring B.C. to cut provincial greenhouse gas emissions by 33 per cent by 2020 compared to 2007 levels, and by 80 per cent by 2050. Those requirements remain in force today.

To begin the task of meeting these targets, a revenue-neutral carbon tax was introduced, as well as a plan to join a California-led regional cap-and-trade system that would see B.C. cap the allowable emissions of its biggest polluters.

But it was the introduction of carbon-neutral government that pushed both the Pacific Carbon Trust and B.C.’s nascent cluster of private-sector carbon project developers, auditors, verifiers and enablers into existence. To lower their greenhouse gas emissions to zero, school districts, Crown corporations, hospitals and most other government bodies would first carefully measure their energy use from buildings, fleets, equipment and paper, then reduce them as much as possible with the help of $75 million in government funds. The last big step was to pay the Pacific Carbon Trust cash to offset every tonne that remained.

Instead of imposing on the public service the Herculean task of sourcing B.C. carbon offsets – which, for the most part, did not exist yet – the Pacific Carbon Trust was given a monopoly over sourcing and selling carbon offsets to government. Scott MacDonald, a former east Vancouver schoolteacher who rose through the ranks of the Ministry of Education all the way to assistant deputy minister, was recruited as CEO. He reports that the learning curve was steep from day one. “When we first started this naively three years ago, we thought we would be able to hang out a shingle and say we are buying offsets and have a surplus of product showing up at our door to buy,” says MacDonald. “We quickly found that wasn’t the case.”

The original intention was that the Pacific Carbon Trust would become a government procurement agent, leaving the development of projects and the actual creation of offsets to existing and emerging private-sector companies. At the time, the most common types of projects fit three basic descriptions: forest carbon-sequestration projects like Darkwoods; fuel switching, where a less carbon-intensive fuel is substituted for common fossil fuels; and energy efficiency, where some new innovation reduces energy needs, like insulating the windows of energy-intensive greenhouse vegetable-growing operations.

MacDonald and his colleagues at the trust soon found themselves investing increasing effort in writing and clarifying the rules (known as “protocols”) for creating offset projects in B.C., educating the industry and hand-holding to encourage companies with potential projects to connect to the needed expertise and conform to the quality standards set out by B.C.’s offset regulations.

The long lead times and upfront investment required on behalf of the private sector to finalize projects emerged as a problem, particularly after the economic downturn in the fall of 2008. Getting a project from conception to completion can take anywhere from a year to two years. Those behind the project must develop a suitable methodology for creating the offset project, akin to a recipe book or set of rules. A third-party validator ensures that the proposed carbon offsets are unique, additional (not the result of business as usual), verifiable, permanent, real and measurable. Once validated, the project can move forward. A third-party verifier must then confirm the quantity of offset tonnes created by the project and these offsets are then posted on a registry, which tracks the movement of the offsets. Once all those steps are completed, carbon offsets (measured in tonnes) are ready for sale. Many projects do not make it to completion.


Pages


Join us on LinkedIn Download on the App Store

@BCBusiness Twitter

bcbusiness
bcbusiness Vancouver real estate has always been pricey—here's the proof: https://t.co/qh00kgIvY1 https://t.co/hbSkdmi2R5
bcbusiness
bcbusiness RT @Resource_Works: #Kamloops at crossroads, with #copper and #gold mine in the balance. Our Facebook page: https://t.co/kkr69QewSE From @b